Tuesday, March 3, 2015

United Nations is urged to Refer Sri Lanka to International Criminal Court.



1) The Sri Lankan State is not ethnically neutral                         In fact, most of the serious crimes in question were perpetrated by the state apparatus. For example: “Between September 2008 and 19 May 2009, the Sri Lankan Army advanced its military campaign into the Vanni using large-scale and widespread shelling, causing large numbers of civilian deaths.” Report of the UN Secretary-General’s Panel of Experts on Sri Lanka, 31 March 2011.


2) The Sri Lankan judiciary is not ethnically neutral                        From the mass killings of Tamils starting in 1958 to date, justice has not been served. The courts have proved inadequate and successive governments have appointed ineffective inquiries under international pressure that have not once led to the punishment of perpetrators. (Amnesty International, “Twenty Years of Make Believe: Sri Lanka’s Commissions of Inquiry,” 11 June 2009).


3) There is no political will in Sri Lanka to provide justice for the Tamils.                       The domestic 2010 Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) has not delivered Justice to Tamils: “…the LLRC is deeply flawed, does not meet international standards for an effective accountability mechanism.” UN Secretary General’s Panel of Expert’s Report on Accountability in Sri Lanka (March 31, 2011).


The involvement of the international community in overseeing a domestic inquiry also ended up in failure, when the International Independent Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP) resigned in March 2008. (Human Rights Watch - Sri Lanka: Domestic Inquiry into Abuses a Smokescreen - October 27, 2009).


“International monitoring of an internal investigation is a waste of time” noted a memorandum handed over to the UN last week by the Jaffna University Professors in Sri Lanka.


It is important to note that, change of guard in Sri Lanka will not result in the change of institutionalized impunity. Even though the President has been changed, the political environment vis-a-vis Tamils, has not changed. 


Almost all the leaders of the current Government were leaders of previous governments when repeated killings of Tamils in large numbers took place and these leaders not only failed to protect the Tamils but blocked any attempts to bring the perpetrators to justice.

Importantly, the current President Mr. Sirisena is potentially culpable for crimes committed while he served as the acting Defense Minister during the period at the end of the war, when large number of Tamils were killed. According the Economist Magazine edition on January 3rd, 2015 "Sirisena is hardly a beacon of hope for the Tamils: he was acting as defense minister in the nightmarish final fortnight of the war.”

Additionally, the presences of several former military personal, including the military commander at the end of the war General Fonseka, are in senior positions in the current government. This along with current president’s potential culpability will have serious effect on neutrality and effectiveness of any domestic or hybrid mechanisms. 


The fact is that the military apparatus from the war is still intact and the Tamil areas in the North-East are heavily militarized, creating deep fear among Tamils, so it is unlikely that victims / witnesses will come forward before a domestic or hybrid tribunal. 


To Highlight the Urgency of this referral TGTE have initiated a one Million Signature Campaign to get worldwide support from different nationalities. The appeal is to be translated in 15 languages. The pursuit of Justice Verses the pursuit of peace is a false choice. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

*Some believe holding on and hanging in there are signs of great strength*

*Some believe holding on and hanging in there are signs of great strength*. However, there are times when it takes much more strength to kno...