வியர்வையை சிந்தி வேதனையை அறுவடை செய்யும் தமிழக விவசாயிகளை குறித்து டெல்லியில் இருந்து
வெளிவரும் ஹிந்துஸ்தான் டைம்ஸ் எனும் ஏட்டின் நிறுவனம் வெளியிடும் மின்ட் பத்திரிக்கையில்
வந்த கட்டுரை.
Tamil Nadu’s farmers are the most distress-ridden
in India
Mint’s rural distress index is below its median
value, but it conceals varying distress levels across states
Protesting Tamil Nadu farmers dress as women
as they continue with their demand seeking compensation for drought in the
state on Saturday in New Delhi.
Uttar
Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath’s announcement of farm loan waiver has
given credence to similar demands from across the country. Those making these
demands include political parties, protesting farmers and even the judiciary.
An earlier Plainfacts column had pointed out how farm loan waivers can be
counter-productive in the long run, a fact which is often overlooked while
seeking temporary relief, which loan waivers bring. This larger point, however,
does not undermine the need for providing relief to India’s distress-ridden
rural economy.
In April
2015, Mint had developed a quarterly index of rural distress to measure the
relative well-being of India’s rural economy. The index seemed to peak during
drought years, which underlines the importance of monsoon for India’s farming
and rural economy. Updating the index for latest available data, we find that
rural distress index, which had reached its second-highest level in March 2015,
has been falling since then and was less than its median value in December
2016, the latest quarter for which data is available.
Mint’s
index of rural distress is based on year-on-year growth of agricultural GDP,
rural wages and domestic tractor sales (due to lack of export data, sales till
September 2003 include exports). The index is a simple average of normalised
(on a scale of 0 to 1) values of three items in such a way that higher values
signify increased distress, with 0 and 1 signifying minimum and maximum
distress.
The trend
is expected given normal rainfall last year after two back-to-back weak monsoon
years. A look at trends in individual constituents of the index shows that a
pick-up in agricultural GDP growth and improvement in tractors sales has a
greater role in recovery than rural wage growth. It is to be noted that rural
wages include wages in the non-farm sector as well. This is in keeping with the
logic that a normal monsoon after two back-to-back rainfall deficient years has
led to a rejuvenation of cultivation activity, even as non-farm rural activity
is still in recovery mode, partly due to demonetisation which is expected to
have led to a bigger deflationary impact on the non-farm sector, as was argued
in an earlier Plainfacts column.
How does
one explain this macro picture with growing demands for farm-loan waivers? Does
this mean that the ongoing protest by Tamil Nadu’s farmers does not reflect the
ground reality?
Here’s one
statistic. India’s total rainfall from south-west monsoon and in the
post-monsoon period (from 30 September 2016 to 31 December 2016) was 8.2% less
than its long-period average. For Tamil Nadu, the value is 43.7% less than the
long-period average value. Unlike northern and eastern states, Tamil Nadu receives
majority of its rainfall in the post-monsoon period.
To be sure,
rainfall is just one cause of rural distress. Farmer suicide statistics from
the National Crime Records Bureau show that bankruptcy or indebtedness were
bigger reasons for suicides than crop failure due to natural causes. The
financial well-being of a farmer would also depend on the overall situation of
the rural economy and her own financial condition. These conditions, like
rainfall, can vary significantly across states.
Mint has taken
year-on-year growth in monthly average of rural wages for December 2016 (latest
available figures) and total income of agricultural households from the
National Sample Survey Office’s (NSSO) situation assessment survey, which was
carried out in 2013, to capture these two indicators.
We take
NSSO figures instead of per capita agricultural GDP values due to two reasons.
One, we do not have quarterly GSDP growth rate figures for states, like the
all-India GDP numbers. Two, agricultural household income estimates give a
better idea about the income of farmers unlike agricultural GDP, which would
include the income of non-farming community engaged in agricultural and allied
activities. It is unlikely that structural factors facing an agricultural
household would have changed drastically in a short span of three-four years.
Putting
normalised values of these three indicators (with distress increasing from 0 to
1) together shows that Tamil Nadu’s farmers might indeed be the most
distress-ridden among India’s major states. The normalisation process assigns
higher scores to distress and lower scores to prosperity, and hence states with
relatively high agricultural household incomes and high rural wage growth have
relatively lower scores, while states with higher rainfall deficit have higher
scores signifying higher distress. Also, the normalisation process has been
done across states and not across time (like the national rural distress
index).
Instead of
taking an average of the three indicators (as in the case of the national rural
distress index), it may be more useful to look at the levels of each individual
indicator to understand the different causes of distress in different states.
For example, Bihar fares high on the sum total of the three normalized indices
despite having received much better rainfall than most states due to its low
agricultural household income levels. West Bengal figures among the worst on
account of agricultural household incomes, but it has lower distress due to its
highest growth of rural wages among all states.
The short
point is, rainfall deficiency is to farm distress what stubble is to a
harvested field. If our policy makers are interested in eradicating rural distress
they must go to the root of the matter which lies in overall rejuvenation of
the rural economy and thinking of ways to augment rural incomes.
-Courtesy: The Mint.
#tamilnadu_agriculturaist
#mint_column
#தமிழக_விவசாயிகள்
#KSRadhakrishnanpostings
#KSRpostings
கே.எஸ்.இராதாகிருஷ்ணன்
12-07-2017
No comments:
Post a Comment